USCCB Chairman Welcomes Ninth Circuit Decision Upholding Preliminary Injunction on Refugee Resettlement Pause and Travel Ban

June 13, 2017

INDIANAPOLIS—On June 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit largely affirmed a nationwide preliminary injunction against implementation of sections of the Administration’s executive order that attempted to suspend and limit the U.S. refugee resettlement program and also attempted to ban the entry of people from six Muslim-majority countries.

A statement from Bishop Joe Vásquez of Austin, Texas, chair of the Committee on Migration regarding the Ninth Circuit ruling follows:

“I am heartened by the decision of the 9th Circuit to maintain the temporary halt implementing certain provisions of the March 6th Executive Order. Upholding the injunction will allow us to continue welcoming and serving refugees fleeing persecution.  Together with my brother bishops, we believe it is possible to simultaneously provide for the security of our country and have a humane refugee policy that upholds our national heritage and moral responsibility. We remain dedicated to accompanying and supporting our brothers and sisters who for various reasons have been forced to leave their homeland. We follow the example of Pope Francis and pledge to them “a duty of justice, civility and solidarity.”


RCUSA Statement on the Decision of the 4th Circuit Court

Below is the statement on the decision by the 4th Circuit Court, put out by Refugee Council USA (RCUSA), of which USCCB/MRS is a member organization:

RCUSA is heartened that the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling against the Executive Order that was issued on March 6th. In doing so,  it found that the President’s travel ban is likely to be ruled unconstitutional. This win means that, as the world faces an historic displacement crisis, America’s doors will remain open, as a symbol of U.S. global leadership at a time when it is sorely needed.

Hans Van de Weerd, Chair of RCUSA, states; “Our hope is that -if this case makes its way to the US Supreme Court-  it too will  uphold the 4th Circuit decision to preserve the proud American traditions of welcome and non-discrimination. As always, RCUSA stands at the ready and welcomes the opportunity to work with the Administration and Congress to ensure that the U.S. refugee resettlement program is successful and secure.”


USCCB Committee on Migration Chair Thankful for Administration’s Decision to Extend Temporary Protection for Haitians; Urges Continued Engagement on Humanitarian Assistance

May 22, 2017

WASHINGTON—The chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Committee on Migration, Bishop Joe S. Vásquez of Austin, Texas, offered his appreciation to Secretary John Kelly of the Department of Homeland Security for his decision to extend Temporary Protective Status for Haitians in the United States for six months but urged continued engagement and humanitarian assistance to improve conditions in Haiti.

Full statement follows:

“On behalf of the USCCB Committee on Migration, I express gratitude to Secretary Kelly of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Trump Administration for extending another six months of Temporary Protective Status (TPS) to over 58,000 Haitians living and working in the United States legally.  While this extension is helpful, it still leaves many Haitian families in the United States in an insecure and vulnerable position, particularly with respect to ensuring legal work authorization. Extending TPS serves an important humanitarian role by providing for the safety, well-being, and stability of Haitians living in the United States. We encourage our government to work proactively with the Haitian government to provide life-saving aid and recovery assistance. Haiti will continue to struggle to receive back those who are temporarily protected, even those who may be returned in the near future. Through the Church’s service networks, we will continue to assist Haitian families in the U.S., aid the rebuilding process in Haiti and look for opportunities to collaborate with the Church in Haiti and the Haitian and U.S. governments.”


USCCB Committee On Migration Letter to House Judiciary Committee

Click below to read the letter from Committee on Migration Chair, Bishop Joe S. Vásquez, on three bills that were before the House Judiciary Committee, involving immigration and law enforcement.

House Judiciary Committee Mark Up Letter

Full text of the letter below:


May 18, 2017

House Committee on the Judiciary

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515


Dear Chairman Goodlatte and Ranking Member Conyers:

I  write  on  behalf  of  the  U.S.  Conference  of  Catholic  Bishops’  Committee  on  Migration (USCCB/COM) to express our opposition to three bills that are scheduled for mark up in your committee this Thursday, May 18, 2017: (1) H.R. 2431, the “Michael Davis, Jr. and Danny Oliver in Honor of State and Local Law Enforcement Act” ; (2) H.R. 2406, the “Immigration and Customs Enforcement Authorization Act of 2017;” and (3) H.R. 2407, the “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Authorization Act.”

The USCCB/COM acknowledges and accepts the role of the government in ensuring the integrity of our border and enforcement of our laws. We appreciate the government’s commitment to public safety and recognize the contributions of law enforcement. However, we believe that, together, these three bills would constitute an unacceptable expansion in immigration enforcement that would contravene the principle of treating all individuals with human dignity, regardless of their immigration status.

H.R. 2431 proposes massive increases to immigrant detention. Further, we believe it would undermine community trust of local law enforcement, rollback existing protections for accompanied children in the context of family detention, and erode the existing framework for extension of Temporary Protected Status (TPS).

USCCB/COM is troubled by many of the provisions in this measure, including those that would:

Expand Detention: H.R. 2431 calls for further increases in our already expansive immigration detention network and for detention of not only those pending removal but those awaiting a decision. Broadening detention to this population would result in the mass detention of asylum seekers, many fleeing persecution and torture, while they are working to comply with their immigration proceedings. We fear it would result in increased retraumatization and is not necessary in this time of fiscal austerity when other, more effective mechanisms like community-sponsored case management based alternatives to detention are available.

Expand State and Local Immigration Enforcement: As written, H.R. 2431 would create a disjointed national immigration policy that could lead to 50 different state immigration policies. It would allow states or political subdivisions of states to create their own criminal and civil penalties for federal immigration violations so long as the penalties applied do not exceed those of federal law.

Limit Protections for Accompanied Children: H.R. 2431 would strip existing protections from accompanied children, including the right to be detained in the least restrictive setting. This could lead to increased family detention, which we have long opposed as an inhumane practice. Detaining children is psychologically and physically damaging; it also is contrary to international human rights law and generally accepted child welfare principles.

Erode the TPS Framework: H.R. 2431 would further undermine the existing TPS framework. Congress created TPS in 1990 as a uniform procedure to provide temporary protection to individuals who cannot safely return to their countries of origin. It was a bipartisan effort signed into law as part of the Immigration Act of 1990 by President George H. W. Bush. H.R. 2431 would establish a new extreme threshold that would require Congress to pass legislation, within 90 days of a request by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), to extend TPS designations. We fear that this would, effectively, result in the end of the use of this vital humanitarian program, which has helped protect many families whose lives and homes have been upended by natural and man-made disasters. We believe that it would be unjust to prevent those suffering from such disasters from seeking temporary refuge in our country.

In addition, USCCB/COM also opposes H.R. 2406 and H.R. 2407. H.R. 2406 would expand the ability of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to carry out warrantless arrests of individuals. Many in our communities and parishes are already living in fear of deportation and family separation, and this bill will further fuel these concerns. H.R. 2406, further, would legislatively mandate the establishment of a Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE)

Office to serve families of victims of “criminal aliens.” While we recognize the tragedy that all crime victims and their families endure and seek to offer our solace for their losses, we are concerned that H.R. 2406 does not contain any provisions to assist immigrant victims who have been targeted as a result of a hate crime. Furthermore, we fear that codification of the VOICE office by Congress will feed into rhetoric that seeks to portray all immigrants as criminals. We also are very concerned that the bill would prohibit the operation of the Office of Public Advocate within ICE. We note with appreciation our engagement with ICE at the national and the field office level and believe that such engagement with civil society is essential to ensuring that DHS policies are just and humane.

Finally, H.R. 2407 would make the E-verify system permanent. USCCB/COM believes that the overarching goals of E-Verify are meritorious but that improvements to the program are needed. Such improvements include complimentary labor and employment protections to ensure that E-Verify does not become a tool to undermine workplace rights or take advantage of workers’ vulnerabilities.

For the reasons stated above, the USCCB/COM believes that H.R. 2431, H.R. 2406, and H.R. 2407 are not viable ways to progress border security and internal immigration enforcement. We ask that you not support these bills and instead work to create a comprehensive immigration bill that reforms all aspects of our immigration system in a common-sense and humane manner and which promotes the common good.



Most Rev. Joe S. Vásquez

Bishop of Austin

Chairman, USCCB Committee on Migration


USCCB Committee on Migration Letter to House and Senate on Sensitive Locations

On April 24, the USCCB Committee on Migration Chair, Rev. Joe S. Vásquez, sent letters to both the United States House of Representatives and to the United States Senate asking for both chambers of Congress to look at the way that Enforcement Actions occur at Sensitive Locations. Read the letters below.

USCCB Committee On Migration Sensitive Locations Letter (House)

USCCB Committee On Migration Sensitive Locations Letter (Senate)


U.S. Bishops Migration Chairman Bishop Joe Vásquez Responds to New Executive Order

WASHINGTON—The Most Reverend Joe S. Vásquez, Bishop of Austin and Chair of the USCCB Committee on Migration, says that President Trump’s latest Executive Order still puts vulnerable populations around the world at risk. In a statement issued after the announcement of today’s travel suspension, Bishop Vásquez says that while we seek to maintain our values and safety, we must also exercise compassion in assisting and continuing to welcome the stranger.

Bishop Vázquez’s full statement follows:

“We remain deeply troubled by the human consequences of the revised executive order on refugee admissions and the travel ban. While we note the Administration’s efforts to modify the Executive Order in light of various legal concerns, the revised  Order    still leaves many innocent lives at risk.

The removal of one of the original seven predominantly Muslim countries temporarily barred from entering the United States is welcome, but we are disappointed that the revised order maintains the temporary shutdown of the U.S. refugee admissions program, continues the more than 60 percent reduction in the number of refugees who can be resettled into the United States this year, and still temporarily bars nationals from six predominantly Muslim countries from entering the United States.

The U.S. Catholic Bishops have long recognized the importance of ensuring public safety and would welcome reasonable and necessary steps to accomplish that goal.

However, based on the knowledge that refugees are already subjected to the most vigorous vetting process of anyone who enters the United States, there is no merit to pausing the refugee resettlement program while considering further improvement to that vetting process.

The United States has long provided leadership in resettling refugees. We believe in assisting all those who are vulnerable and fleeing persecution, regardless of their religion, including Christians, Muslims, and all others. We believe that by helping to resettle the most vulnerable, we are living out our Christian faith and “welcoming the stranger” as Jesus has challenged us to do.

Today, more than 65 million people around the world are forcibly displaced from their homes. Given this extraordinary level of suffering, the U.S. Catholic Bishops reaffirm their support for, and efforts to protect, all who flee persecution and violence, as just one part of the perennial and global work of the Church in defense of vulnerable persons. Resettling only 50,000 refugees a year, down from 110,000, does not reflect the need, our compassion, and our capacity as a nation. We have the ability to continue to assist the most vulnerable among us without sacrificing our values as Americans or the safety and security of our nation.”


U.S. Bishops Chair on Migration Responds to DHS Memoranda on Immigration Enforcement and Border Security

February 23 2017

WASHINGTON—On February 20, 2017, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued two memoranda implementing Executive Orders 13768 and 13767, relating to border and interior immigration enforcement.  In response to the memoranda, the Most Reverend Joe S. Vásquez, Bishop of Austin and Chair of the USCCB Committee on Migration, has issued the following statement:

“We recognize the importance of ensuring public safety and would welcome reasonable and necessary steps to do that.  However, the two memoranda issued by Secretary Kelly on February 20th contain a number of provisions that, if implemented as written, will harm public safety rather than enhance it.  Moreover, taken in their entirety, the policies contained in these memoranda will needlessly separate families, upend peaceful communities, endanger the lives and safety of the most vulnerable among us, breakdown the trust that currently exists between many police departments and immigrant communities, and sow great fear in those communities.

The DHS memoranda eliminates important protections for vulnerable populations, including unaccompanied children and asylum seekers. They greatly expand the militarization of the U.S./Mexico border.  Taken together, these memoranda constitute the establishment of a large-scale enforcement system that targets virtually all undocumented migrants as ‘priorities’ for deportation, thus prioritizing no one.  The memoranda further seek to promote local law enforcement of federal immigration laws without regard for the existing relationships of trust between local law enforcement officials and immigrant communities.  The engagement of local law enforcement to enforce federal immigration law can undermine public safety by making many who live in immigrant communities fearful of cooperating with local law enforcement in both reporting and investigating criminal matters.

I urge the Administration to reconsider the approach embodied in these memoranda, just as it should reconsider the approach it has taken in a number of executive orders and actions issued over the last month.  Together, these have placed already vulnerable immigrants among us in an even greater state of vulnerability.

Moving forward, we remain steadfast in our commitment to care for and respect the human dignity of all, regardless of their immigration status.  During this unsettling time, we will redouble our work to accompany and protect our immigrant brothers and sisters and recognize their contributions and inherent dignity as children of God.”


U.S. Bishops’ Chair On Migration Responds To Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Decision

WASHINGTON—On February 9, 2017, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a unanimous decision upholding a lower court’s temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking the implementation of several key provisions of Executive Order 13769. The TRO was put in place by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on February 3, 2017. The provisions that that have temporarily been blocked by the TRO include: a 120 day halt of the U.S. refugee resettlement program; an indefinite prohibition of resettling and admitting Syrian refugees; a preference for resettling Christian minorities; a case by case evaluation of refugee admission during the 120 day pause on resettlement; and a 90 day prohibition on entry, travel, and visas for individuals from the seven identified predominantly-Muslim countries of Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

In response to the Appeals Court ruling, Most Reverend Joe Vasquez, Bishop of Austin, Texas, and Chair of the Committee on Migration stated: “We welcome the decision of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. We respect the rule of law and the American judicial process. We remain steadfast in our commitment to resettling refugees and all those fleeing persecution. At this time, we remain particularly dedicated to ensuring that affected refugee and immigrant families are not separated and that they continue to be welcomed to our country. We will continue to welcome the newcomer as it is a vital part of our Catholic faith and an enduring element of our American values and tradition.”


USCCB Chairmen Express Solidarity with Muslim Community, Deep Concern over Religious Freedom Issues, in Response to Executive Order on Refugees

January 31, 2017

WASHINGTON—On January 27, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued an executive order that, among other things: suspends issuance of visas and other immigration benefits to nationals of seven predominantly Muslim countries for 90 days; indefinitely suspends resettlement of refugees from Syria, which is also predominantly Muslim, subject to a possible exception for those who are “religious minorities” in their home countries and facing religious persecution; and suspends virtually the entire U.S. refugee resettlement program for 120 days, also subject to a possible exception for such “religious minorities.”

Most Reverend Mitchell T. Rozanski, Bishop of Springfield and Chairman of the USCCB Committee on Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs, Most Reverend William E. Lori, Archbishop of Baltimore and Chairman of the USCCB Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty, and Most Reverend Oscar Cantú, Bishop of Las Cruces and Chairman of the USCCB Committee on International Justice and Peace, jointly issued the following statement in response to this action:

We recognize that Friday evening’s Executive Order has generated fear and untold anxiety among refugees, immigrants, and others throughout the faith community in the United States.  In response to the Order, we join with other faith leaders to stand in solidarity again with those affected by this order, especially our Muslim sisters and brothers.  We also express our firm resolution that the Order’s stated preference for “religious minorities” should be applied to protect not only Christians where they are a minority, but all religious minorities who suffer persecution, which includes Yazidis, Shia Muslims in majority Sunni areas, and vice versa.  While we also recognize that the United States government has a duty to protect the security of its people, we must nevertheless employ means that respect both religious liberty for all, and the urgency of protecting the lives of those who desperately flee violence and persecution.  It is our conviction as followers of the Lord Jesus that welcoming the stranger and protecting the vulnerable lie at the core of the Christian life.  And so, to our Muslim brothers and sisters and all people of faith, we stand with you and welcome you.


President and Vice President of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Stand in Defense of All Faiths in Response to Executive Order on Refugees

January 30, 2017

“When did we see you a stranger and welcome you?”

Matthew 25:38

WASHINGTON— Cardinal Daniel N. DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), and Archbishop José H. Gomez of Los Angeles, vice president of the USCCB, have issued the following joint statement regarding the recent executive order on the new refugee policy announced by President Trump this past Friday. President Trump’s executive order suspends the entry of refugees into the United States for 120 days. The order also indefinitely stops the admission of Syrian refugees and for 90 days, bars individuals from seven predominantly Muslim countries.

Full joint statement as follows:

Over the past several days, many brother bishops have spoken out in defense of God’s people. We are grateful for their witness.  Now, we call upon all the Catholic faithful to join us as we unite our voices with all who speak in defense of human dignity.

The bond between Christians and Muslims is founded on the unbreakable strength of charity and justice.  The Second Vatican Council in Nostra Aetate urged us to sincerely work toward a mutual understanding that would “promote together for the benefit of all mankind social justice and moral welfare, as well as peace and freedom.” The Church will not waiver in her defense of our sisters and brothers of all faiths who suffer at the hands of merciless persecutors.

The refugees fleeing from ISIS and other extremists are sacrificing all they have in the name of peace and freedom.  Often, they could be spared if only they surrendered to the violent vision of their tormentors.  They stand firm in their faith.  Many are families, no different from yours or mine, seeking safety and security for their children. Our nation should welcome them as allies in a common fight against evil.  We must screen vigilantly for infiltrators who would do us harm, but we must always be equally vigilant in our welcome of friends.

The Lord Jesus fled the tyranny of Herod, was falsely accused and then deserted by his friends. He had nowhere to lay His head (Lk. 9:58). Welcoming the stranger and those in flight is not one option among many in the Christian life.  It is the very form of Christianity itself.  Our actions must remind people of Jesus. The actions of our government must remind people of basic humanity.  Where our brothers and sisters suffer rejection and abandonment we will lift our voice on their behalf. We will welcome them and receive them. They are Jesus and the Church will not turn away from Him.

Our desire is not to enter the political arena, but rather to proclaim Christ alive in the world today.  In the very moment a family abandons their home under threat of death, Jesus is present.  And He says to each of us, “whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me” (MT 25:40).

En Español